Another unnecessary sequel for a franchise that took a nose-dive during its last outing.
Tak3n represents what is the third film (as if you couldn't guess by that clever name!) in this Liam Neeson action/thriller series. The first film was a strong action film for Neeson, although I consider it a bit overrated all things considered and nowhere near as strong as some other Neeson-centric films (*cough The Grey cough cough*). A sequel was a no brainer given how successful the first film was but unfortunately the second film was idiotic, generic, and abysmal -- much unlike the first. Taken 2 introduced director Olivier Megaton to the series who has run it into the ground a bit.
Most critics are being incredibly harsh on Tak3n, giving it scores that would result in it being one of the worst reviewed films of the year (and it's only January). Overall, I'd say they are being a little too critical of it and, much like Michael Bay films, are taking out their displeasure of the film on the director rather than the film itself. Tak3n is no masterpiece, that much is certain. Nor is it one of Neeson's stronger films. But given how terrible Taken 2 was, I can comfortably say that Tak3n is better than it, although many issues from that film still carry over into this one.
![]() |
[In Liam Neeson voice] "You can't see me behind this sign! I'm invisible!" |
![]() |
Porsche: more durable than you would think! |
![]() |
"Is there any more evidence I could eat at this crime scene?" |
Ultimately Tak3n represents what I would call a forgettable sequel. It doesn't play into the larger picture (is there one in this series?) at all, it doesn't bring much new to the genre, and besides being a decently okay one-time view, it's not something you would need to see again.
Given how successful it has been over the past couple days, I'm guessing that a Taken 4 (or perhaps, 4aken?) is probable. I just pray that Liam Neeson only signs on if Megaton is no longer director because between the last two films it's clear: Megaton has got to go.
CONS:
- The film doesn't play into any larger picture that this series is trying to achieve. Once all the cards are out on the table, Mills' involvement is pretty much a coincidence
- Atrocious action editing/camerawork. Whatever happened to letting the camera hang onto a scene?
- Some really weird aspects such as: a Russian operative in his whitey tighties, and Forest Whitaker's detective eats evidence and plays with rubber bands and chess pieces. Wait what?
- Whitaker doesn't do well in this film. At times it sounds like he is reciting lines
- Nothing really inventive or new is brought to the action genre
- The film feels much longer than its runtime
- Megaton's direction
- These characters (i.e. Bryan and Kim) have some decent characterization behind them now that we are on the third film. I cared about what happened to them
- Some cool action stunts (although most are ruined by the terrible editing)
- Well chosen soundtrack
- Neeson is still a badass
- I don't know if I'd call it "worthwhile", but I wasn't mad that I saw Tak3n. It met, and possibly slightly surpassed, my low expectations
Rath's Review Score: 5.5/10
Megaton is an appalling action director and the Takens are action films. I really couldn't understand some bits, as they were edited to incomprehension. Better than 2 but far below 3. Time to retire, Bryan!
ReplyDeleteI think Bryan could still have some fun adventures, I would just like to see a far more capable director come in. And I agree! Some of the action scenes were incomprehensible.
DeleteYeah, I have no intention of paying money to see this. That said, I will probably watch if I can see it for free on a movie channel or something. By the way, 4aken would be the best name ever for the sequel, haha!
ReplyDelete-James
Definitely not worth the money and I would advise a watch only if you have nothing better to do. Its just a very unnecessary movie.
Delete