Go see Johnny Depp in his latest bomb?
Or go see Jennifer Lopez in hers?
Yep, you guessed it. Now that I've caught up with many of the limited releases from last year, it's time for the January doldrums; films that it would seem the distributers know aren't all that good so they have banished them to the beginning of the year when movie attendance is often low (which, interestingly enough has not been happening this year with the breakout success of American Sniper). Out of the two previously mentioned choices, I was most interested in Mortdecai (as opposed to J-Lo's Boy Next Door) because I wanted to see if it really was as bad as the critics were saying it was. Would this be the film that kills Depp's career and leaves it on ice, pending a revival years from now? Truly, as a fan of some of Depp's films, it's been a sad time to watch his career slowly wither away from the blockbuster hits he used to produce. At the end of the day though, he type-casted himself into a corner, and it's a corner that audiences are no longer particularly fond of unless the word "Pirates" is attached to the title. Based on the somewhat lackluster previews, Mortdecai seemed no different as it's yet another example of Depp portraying a wonderfully odd and goofy character. Early critic reviews have been destroying it, resulting in what will probably be one of the lowest Metacritic scores of 2015 once it is all said and done. I questioned, "It can't be that bad can it?"
No, it can't. Mortdecai is no where near the best and/or funniest comedy in the world, but my God, were the critics far too harsh on this one or what I like to reserve some of my lowest scores for films that are truly bad...ones that make you angry you wasted time and money on them and that make you feel dumber for watching them. Mortdecai is not one of those films and while I will most likely barely remember it come March, that doesn't mean it deserves some of the scores it was getting.
![]() |
I wish it was the customary greeting in America... |
![]() |
Metaphor for Depp's career? |
My main issues with Mortdecai are with its run time (nearly two hours at 106 minutes) and its R-rating. The runtime was an issue that I knew going in and I couldn't help but notice all the areas where the film could have used a trimming. There are several unnecessary and unfunny scenes scattered throughout that don't serve a purpose. Furthermore, why in God's name was this movie rated R? I heard two f-bombs and everything else was well within the realm of PG-13. Given that the film was such a huge bomb at the box office this weekend, I question why the studio didn't simply cut one of the "f**ks" out and make the film instantly more accessible.
![]() |
"Wait why did we go for an R-rating again?" |
What it makes it is this: an average afternoon at the theater that will make you smile, but one that you probably won't recall next week, much less at the end of the year.
CONS:
- A significant amount of jokes just aren't funny
- Too long for a silly comedy
- It's rated R but often acts like a PG film with sprinkles of PG-13 sexual innuendo. This "bomb" was due mostly to this odd film rating
- Many unnecessary scenes that could have been trimmed
- Uninteresting plots
- Underused Olivia Munn and Jeff Goldblum
- Depp is well immersed in the character and provides several laughs and funny quirks
- The rest of the principal cast does well enough
- A few jokes are funny and most of the film's running gags are pretty good, the best of which is kissing the moustache
- It's dumb fun and doesn't pretend to be much more than that
Rath's Review Score: 5/10
I read an article from mid 2014 from the executives from the film saying they think the character is franchise-able and Depp would sign on for more films if possible. But based on recent reviews and box office reports, doesn't look like that will happen. Just funny they thought this would be a huge hit! I won't be seeing it, I think it looks terrible unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteIt would have been franchise-able if it had been a better starting point without a January release. I agree...definitely don't see this one getting a sequel. I'm not exactly crying about it.
DeleteLike most people, I'm just sick of seeing Depp act like a idiot and waving his arms about. It's like some awful pantomime. What happened to him? Even in the slowest weeks I think I'd avoid this one! Your review suggests it might be worth a rental in a few months!
ReplyDeleteIf you're sick of Depp, there really isn't anything here that you would find worthwhile. I still enjoy him to a certain degree...but I think if he wants his career to continue, he needs to start finding some more serious roles.
DeleteAs to what happened to him? I think he found so much success with Sparrow in Pirates that he (and studio executives) thought it would translate well across different types of film genres. Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't but I think audiences are, as you stated, sick of it now.
Depp really should be choosing better material, or at least financially successful material. He is a really fun actor to watch. But I can't say that I am surprised this was just average.
ReplyDelete-James
I think he needs to choose roles that are far away from his type-casted weird characters. It's pretty evident that he can act...but it's hard to take him seriously (or get excited for his films) if he is essentially the same version of every character every time.
DeleteIt's something I deeply worry about for Liam Neeson too these days.
I personally thought the trailers looked kind of funny but I didn't have any illusions about it being great. Really looked like a modern day Inspector Clouseau, unfortunately it looks the like general public is tired of Depp's current state. Personally, I still want to see this at some point.
ReplyDeleteIf you're interested in it slightly, I think you'll have a good enough time. I imagine it's a film that will be running on TV in a few years and nobody will be angry that nothing else is on on a Saturday afternoon. Provides some fun, but ultimately forgettable.
Delete